Saturday, July 23, 2011

The cost of invading privacy

In his entire life period Rupert Murdoch, the media mogul of the world, couldn't have imagined that someday he would be grilled by a bunch of politicians, who he otherwise thought objects of buying and selling, for his empire's journalistic excesses that once he thought were the critical strengths of his media business in drawing more readers and audiences. July 19 was however an altogether different day in his life, a day that exposed his dirty tricks, unethical journalistic practices, and monopolistic business objectives. Amongst serious public scrutiny for scandals running thick around NOTW's telephone hacking practices, an internal committee of British Parliament came heavily on Murdoch's close coterie and to the surprise of world viewers the event was telecast for over three hours. At the beginning of this unprecedented media bashing, a member of an NGO could able to throw a plate of foam cake on Murdoch, which many doubt was a fabulous stage-managed orchestration by Murdoch to garner huge public sympathy at least from those viewers who still believe in scoops, sex scandals, and salacious news.

Though Murdoch started with a humble pitch by calling the day as “the most humble day of his life” he was quite sure as what he wanted to prescribe to the world audience at large. The subtext was quite understandable – irrespective of scandals embroiling News Corp Murdoch is still the emperor of world media and he will continue with that humility although many such NOTW incidents may happen in future and all those without his knowledge as he suggests to the parliamentary committee. Every time he would prefer to slap the charges on his front soldiers and explain to the world that he is ignorant of those facts, as he suggested this time that he was completely unaware of the phone hacking scandals and some senior officials kept him in blank, the fact which he knew thoroughly that nothing in News Cork does happen without his knowledge or approval.

However, the grilling experience took a dramatic mode when Murdoch dragged British PM into the soup by exposing the fact that he was told to enter through the back door. This was too serious a charge against Cameron for which he had to face internal committee for hobnobbing with scandal-hit Murdoch and his media honchos. Moreover, Cameron's decision to appoint Andy Coulson, an ex-editor of NOTW, as communication chief despite Opposition's strong disapproval dragged Cameron into serious public scrutiny. And it seems the days ahead for Cameron could be tougher.

Back to the testimony of Rebekah Brooks, the close aide of Ruper Murdoch, she presumably was quite confident about the state of affairs at NOTW during her editorship while most of these scandals erupted. She chose to admit to the mistakes committed by NOTW journalists because there was no more leg room for her to play further tricks, as Scotland Yard had enough evidences for phone hacking and bribing some section of police. Nonetheless, she tried her best to jump the charges of bribing to police by simply putting the gun on somebody else's shoulder because she knew that the gravity of charges of this kind could be more disastrous for New Corp.

Well, what if the editors at NOTW hadn't believed in such yellow journalism? Certainly, NOTW could have been a more powerful newspaper and News Corp could have acquired the BSkyB deal easily without any political opposition, and Murdoch a more powerful man than what's he today. It seems Murdoch was far from the big picture of future and this NOTW episode is a reminder of his glaring blunder in comparing media business with fast-food chain. Truth has a different meaning and probably Murdoch has learned it.

No comments:

Post a Comment